DSweet

I've been asked to inquire about the ability of FusionPro (Desktop, Producer or otherwise) in any ability to automatically email an output file to a customer's address. I do know that PTI has partnered with Exact Target for the capability of doing mass emails but I recall that there is a checkbox in the composition menu of the desktop version of FusionPro for an "email address". However this can only be activated when the box for "Use FusionPro Producer on Scheduler" is checked. When I check that box (even though we do have Producer available to us) another box comes up and declares that the connection to Producer has failed. Has anyone ever used that functionality to send an output file to a specific client's email address? Or has anyone ever been able to figure another way to automate emailing of output from FusionPro Producer (API) and how do you variable program the email address? Thank you for any help that you can give. .

Thanks Step, That worked ... just not quite as I expected. I originally left the output to multiple files checked when I tried your additional coding and I got 123 files each with one page imposed on the left side of the sheet. Then I turned off the multiple files option and FusionPro composed to what I want. Didn't quite dawn on me that the OpenNewOutputFile() command would work the same as and in place of the multiple file option during composition. Again ... thank you. .

I would like to chime in and make this a "not so simple imposition question". I've set up my template as described above with a single page and a GraphicBox on it and placed this coding in OnRecordStart var imgPath = ".\\Variable Artwork\\" var imgName = Trim(Field("fileName")); var r = new FusionProResource(imgPath + imgName, "graphic", true); FusionPro.Composition.repeatRecordCount = r.countPages; r.pagenumber = FusionPro.Composition.repeatRecordNumber; FindGraphicFrame("ResourcePage").SetGraphic(r); I'm reading in a simple data file that just contains the name of the file that I want to impose so I don't have to keep hard-coding this each time. However I would like to be able to do more than one file at a time. If I have 5 different files that need to be imposed I want the output to be five different files imposed 2-up. The above coding works when I simply compose each record at a time ... but ... when I try to encode all 5 records while using the "output to multiple files" feature and set it to "1" to process each record separately, the resulting output is all five pdf files concatenated together and THEN imposed into one large 2-up file according to THAT page count. I was expecting to get 5 files named "Output_1.pdf, ... , Output_5.pdf" with each one being imposed 2-up according to their individual page lengths. I was wondering why the multiple file functionality doesn't work for this? I've used it before set to 1 on a number of business card templates to process individual card proof files for large lists of sales people. Is there another line of coding that is needed? .

Is there anyway to turn off the "mirror image" effect for side two of the imposition module? I'm trying to imprint on a pre-printed shell and my image for side one and two both have to shift to the left about .5 inches. When I place the -.5" in the image shift section of the "press sheet" it will shift side 1 correctly (.5 inches to the left) however side two shifts to the right by .5" to match/mirror side 1. I need to be able to move side 2 independently and shift it to the left as well and not just mirror side 1. I even tried using the "impositionSheetBackgroundFrontPage" and "impositionSheetBackgroundBackPage" features thinking that maybe if I move the green-outlined "template boxes" that FusionPro creates I would be able to shift the images accordingly. But nothing. Even when I move each template box almost to the farthest corner edge leaving only about a 1" square on the 12.5x19 inch press-sheet sheet imposition scheme the entire image is printed in the same area. I suppose that I could always create two templates for every job - one for the customer proof for approval and an additional one for the print production. I just hate wasted time! Is there any way to move the imposed sides independently from one another?

I just had a request from our sister company on the west coast...they wanted to know if I could supply the FusionPro plug-in for InDesign. Are we able to swap plug-in from machine to machine? If you have FusionPro on an existing machine and you later install InDesign on the same machine is there a way to install the plug-in without having to uninstall and re-install the whole FusionPro suite? Is there simply an "update" feature? .

Hello step, would like to ask you a couple of questions about creating and submitting ppml files to an Indigo (or possibly even an iGen4). Once I create the ppml file (a single .zip file), does the Indigo operator have to create a specific hot folder to accept ppml files? Or can he just drop that .zip file directly into the same hot folder that all pdf files are done as well? Do you create single file ppml's or save off the images in a separate file? Where would you put that image file? Also, when composing ppml files and you want to save off the images to make the job files smaller and faster on the rips, once I select the option to "Save images to an external location" an additional selection comes up that says "Environment". I can't get past it without putting something in there. I've tried looking at the user guide for this but it doesn't even list it or show the proper picture for the ppml composition screen. Do you happen to know what it is? Thank you. Any help I can get would be appreciated? .

Dan, This may be a topic for support but I want to at least start here to get the forum's opinion before I start yelling at support... An associate of mine tried installing our 9.3 version of FusionPro on their system. She has the Creative Suite CC (2014) so I figured everyting would be fine. She uses the Acrobat Pro CC version that came with the Suite. It was not compatable and kept making Acrobat non-responsive and freeze up. She removed it and all is fine again. I've tried to look through the forum, Marcom's site and other version histories for FusionPro but I only seem to find references to Acrobat "DC" and nothing about "CC". Even your version 10 release only references Acrobat DC. It just seems wierd to me that if FusionPro is "compatable" with CS 2014 Cloud Version then it should be compatable with the Acrobat version that come with it. .

Thanks Step. I really thought I had "copy and pasted" it. Not quite sure as to why it came out differently. Guess my mind is slipping. Thanks again. .

It's been too long for this thread to not have something in it so...I have the following simple code which just loops through a set amount of iterations to create a generic table. Everything worked fine until I wanted to add the colors to the rows to make it look like GreenBar paper. Yea I know I'm really dating my age here, but oh well. I took the coding Dan placed earliermyTable.ShadingColor1 = "Blue"; myTable.ShadingPct1 = 20; myTable.ShadingRepeat1 = 1; myTable.ShadingColor2 = "Red"; myTable.ShadingPct2 = 40; myTable.ShadingRepeat2 = 1; myTable.ShadingType = "ByRows"; and I placed it in my table rule var tableRows = 10; var colHead1 = 'Record'; var colHead2 = 'First Name in Stack'; var colHead3 = 'Record'; var colHead4 = 'Last Name in Stack'; var colHead5 = 'Print File Name'; var myTable = new FPTable; myTable.ShadingColor1 = "Blue"; myTable.ShadingPct1 = 20; myTable.ShadingRepeat1 = 1; myTable.ShadingColor2 = "Red"; myTable.ShadingPct2 = 40; myTable.ShadingRepeat2 = 1; myTable.ShadingType = "ByRows"; myTable.AddColumns(10800, 10800, 10800, 10800, 10800); myTable.AddRow(); myTable.Rows[0].Cells[0].Margins = new FPTableMargins; myTable.Rows[0].Cells[0].Margins.Top = 23; myTable.Rows[0].Cells[0].Margins.Bottom = 23; myTable.Rows[0].Cells[0].Margins.Right = 10; myTable.Rows[0].Cells[0].Margins.Left = 10; myTable.Rows[0].Cells[0].Font="PNCSans"; myTable.Rows[0].Cells[0].PointSize=9.5; myTable.Rows[0].Cells[0].VAlign = "Middle" myTable.Rows[0].CopyCells(0, 1, 2, 3, 4); myTable.Rows[0].SetContents(colHead1, colHead2, colHead3, colHead4, colHead5); myTable.Rows[0].Type = "Header"; for ( var a = 1; a <= tableRows; a++) { myTable.AddRow(); myTable.Rows[a].Cells[0].Margins = new FPTableMargins; myTable.Rows[a].Cells[0].Margins.Top = 23; myTable.Rows[a].Cells[0].Margins.Bottom = 23; myTable.Rows[a].Cells[0].Margins.Right = 100; myTable.Rows[a].Cells[0].Margins.Left = 10; myTable.Rows[a].Cells[0].Font="PNCSans"; myTable.Rows[a].Cells[0].PointSize=8.4; myTable.Rows[a].Cells[0].VAlign = "Middle" myTable.Rows[a].CopyCells(0, 1, 2, 3, 4); myTable.Rows[a].Cells[0].Content = "Record 1-"+a; myTable.Rows[a].Cells[1].Content = "First Name 1-"+a; myTable.Rows[a].Cells[2].Content = "Record 2-"+a; myTable.Rows[a].Cells[3].Content = "First Name 2-"+a; myTable.Rows[a].Cells[4].Content = "Print File_"+a; } return myTable.MakeTags(); However no matter where I place the code section for the color (I've tried at the front as shown above, I've tried placing it in front of and after the "myTable.AddRow();" statements, I've tried placing it at the end before the "MakeTags()" statement) each time I get a blank table. The contents of each cell are correct, but no color. Am I missing something? Where does the color coding come in to the programming scheme?

Sorry to be so long in getting back... First off Dan you are correct and I wasn't quite clear enough...the length of the output varies from one record to another but all output pages are 8.5x11. Apologies. The use for this project (for a product warranty company) is that each 2-page letter refers to any number of informational sheets that may accompany the letter depending which product(s) the end customer purchased a warranty for. These info-sheets are pre-built pdf files that simply grow from the end of each letter (using in-line pdf files through an overflow page) depending on the number of "packets" required. Each info-packet may contain anywhere from 3 to 12 pages and the end-user might get any number of these packets attached to their letter. Therefore record 1 might produce 14 pages, record 2 might produce 4 pages, record 3 might produce 20 pages, and so on through the file. Accordingly this output file can not be imposed by FusionPro Imposer as it currently runs. I don't believe you are quite right here. It might be that I just don't understand the process but when I use a stacked imposition and look at the resulting .msg file I see ... ..... Preprocessing record #233, input record 233 Preprocessing record #234, input record 234 Preprocessing record #235, input record 235 Preflight ended 13:58:33 - 1476381513. Composing record #1, input record 1 Sheet #1, record #1 Composing record #2, input record 119 Sheet #1, record #2 Composing record #3, input record 2 Sheet #2, record #1 Composing record #4, input record 120 Sheet #2, record #2 ...... To me this appears that FusionPro has "pre-processed the data file" into memory, starts with record 1 and composes the resulting pdf output on the right side of the output sheet...then it jumps in the data file, reads in record 119, composes that data record in my template and places the output pdf file on the left side of the output sheet. Even though I have chosen "stacked" as my imposition scheme, FusionPro still can only perform a right-left imposition on the output sheet ... it just jumps through the data file picking out the correct records for that output placement. That's why all output information from a template MUST be the same length in order to impose properly. If FusionPro were to impose the "output" for a stacked pdf file I would expect FusionPro to 1.. process a temporary pdf file in a single page format (in this case 8.5x11 pages) then 2.. count the number of pages within that document and finally 3.. step through that temporary file and place the proper pages on the final imposed sheet much in the same manner it currently steps through the data file records. That way even if the bottom of the right stack contains a page or two from say "record 13" and the top of the left side contains the remaining 8 pages from "record 13", when the imposed output sheets are "cut and stacked" the pages come out in their proper order. I realize that this is may be a somewhat unique situation and is only useful for a stacked output, but I do think that others might have the same frustration as I do. My bosses continually scream to impose all jobs to save money and clicks on the machine, but I have to tell them that FusionPro can't, or we have to preprocess all the data files and split them up into several files based on the output pages and feed up to as many as 25 data files for a single job. Which again takes up time and wastes recources thus negating any potential savings from the lower number of clicks on the machines. Sorry to be ranting here because I am a proponent of the FusionPro and would like to see it grow even more in areas that I personally feel like it is lacking. Charts are another big concern but that needs a whole new subject thread. .

Have a bit of a dilemma...have a project that has the possibility of multiple page output for each record in the data (record 1 may have 2 pages, record 2 may have 8 pages, record 3 may have 7 pages, etc...). We want to impose this 2-up to save money, time and print streams produced; however since FusionPro can only impose the input data-stream and not the output print-stream I don't believe that it is possible. I have done some tests in the past with the imposer on similar situations and imposer would either 1-Crash and Flame, or 2-Add pages to the imposition of one side (the smaller output page side) to match up with the other larger output count side thus giving us a huge amount of blank pages that need to be weeded out by hand increasing our time and squandering any potential savings to begin with. Using a bit of calculations we can tell how many pages are produced based on the information in each record; we currently split up all data files by output record count keeping the output counts together (all 3's together all 8's together, etc.). One data file containing as little as only 50 records may have up to a dozen or more data streams depending on the number of output pages that each individual record may produce. Then each "matched sub-set" data sream is fed through the template and sent to a printer ... that way we have matching output counts for the imposition to work with. Very lengthy, very tedious, the possibility of error to mix a batch set from one file with another increases with each new daily data file set we receive ... we receive between 50 to 60 files daily. It's been a while since I've had the chance to look into some of the newer "chunking features" of FusionPro or maybe as part of the imposer itself but is there anything new that would help with this...or has anyone else been down this road and found "a path less travelled", or like Wiley Coyote just hit that same brick wall time and time again? Any help and insight would be appreciated. Thank you. .

Thank you Thomas, that was what I was missing. It now works as you programmed. Thank you. .

Tom, Thank you for your suggestion, but when I tried it the pages just ran together instead of breaking apart to a new page when the size code changed. I've attached my template and a sampling of the data file. All I'm printing is the size "S", "M", "XL", etc on a label. The field OrderQty lets me know how many of that specific label I need. I've attached as well the resulting pdf file from that test run, plus the results that I came up with the hard way...compiling the records one by one and then combinging the pdf files together afterwards. .

That is correct. I get an excel file with shirt orders for small, med, large, up to 6XLT. And another columns tells me how many of each shirt is needed to fulfill this specific order. I then create a label sticker for each shirt size that we send to our shirt vendor so they can count out enough and label them by size for easy picking later on. I used to just print the stickers out one after another running from sheet to sheet, but our vendor for the shirts says that is TOO COMPLICATED for them and wants each size on a separate sheet. .

Thomas, I am trying your script and it works for the data file you have sent over with it. However I am trying to modify it to work with a repeatRecordCount field and it doesn't seem to be going well. Any suggestion please? .

I am going to assume that this is NOT a FusionPro problem, but more likely one of having old templates. We've had a site open for a customer for their stationery needs (biz cards, letterhead, notepads, etc...) since 2009. I created those templates probably in Acrobat 8 using FusionPro somewhere around v6 or v7. So long ago it doesn't really matter. The templates pull in a company logo and places specified text in there places. (YAWN ... I know just stay with me on this.) Everything has been fine from 2009 ... 'til now. The client has since updated their logo and provided me with a new one to place on all of there stationery items. So...since I stored the logo as an outside resource just linked to each of the templates I thought that I would just have to swap out the old resources with the new and I wouldn't need to touch the templates at all. A change that would take around 3 to 5 minutes to do. BAM! SOCKO! OOF! Now ALL those templates didn't work and the message log file came back stating [b][i][color=#1F497D]Graphic is not found or is not processed properly: thomEnv10_Shell.pdf.[/color][/i][/b] [color=#1F497D]Check for file existence and that it is of the proper format.[/color] Every single template that has worked flawlessly for the past 6 and a half years now had the same error message just with a different graphic item reference. Nothing worked. At first I thought that I might have to completely redo AAALLLLLL those templates over again (about 30 or so), but I decided to try something else first. I opened the original template stored off site and without changing anything simply reprocessed a text file, re-saved it, and moved the template .def, .dif and .pdf files to our live site and reprocessed a text file there. Repeated for each of the other templates as well after the first one did work. Now they all work again. No problem anymore but just a question to put out to the forum that I hope someone with a little more Adobe Acrobat knowledge than I might be able to shed some light on. I know that there are different features with each version of Acrobat and many are not backwards compatible, but not being able to read in a simple pdf image of a logo? The logo was given to me as an eps file so I just made it into a pdf file to use since FusionPro does that same process anyway. I even distilled it using Distiller settings for version 5.0. Really puzzled on this one and thinking that maybe I should do this for those templates (and others) each time I get an update to FusionPro or Acrobat as well. I don't know if that's a "Best Practice" or not, but it sure beats the heck out of the shock that I received when 30 or so templates suddenly took a dump! .

I can't believe this...after HOW MANY YEARS of FusionPro Imposer being on the market and this issue still hasn't been fixed or possibly even addressed? My original posts for this even predates this forum and goes back to the older forum format since I can't find any of my original postings. What is given by the client ... a 1-up pdf file with bleed and crop marks to be duplicated in FusionPro for the two sides of a table tent. What is desired ... rotating an image in the imposition and remove the bleed to place the two top edges head to head without any bleed for a chop cut or in my present case the top fold of a table tent. The problem ... as soon as you rotate any row or column on the imposition AND select the "Discard Space and Bleed" for any direction, the bleed area is removed from the background of the pdf but the bleed of any images or text still appears and over-prints the other images. I've included the imposition I used and two pdf files. One is the output that I want to have happen happen and the other shows what FusionPro outputs. I've even measured them and it's off by the bleed amount of the image box. FusionPro appears to be able to remove the bleed from the background of the template pdf file, but an image or text box retains it's bleed settings. Has anyone else figured out a solution.

So the "magnify" closing tag will shut off ALL attributes that are set after the opening tag? No matter how many or what style? Or do you still need the closing tags for styles such as "bold" or "superscript"? What about settings such as a temporary setting for the superscript size and offset? Or does "magnify" just create a sort of formatting sub-routine section and the closing magnify tag simply closes this sub-routine and reverts the style and settings back to those of the original text box? .

Hello Diane, Try this one... if ((Field("Name") == "") && (Field("Email") == "") && (Field("Phone") == "")) { return Resource("Blank"); } else { return Resource("YellowLine"); }I think you were a bit mixed up with the use of parenthesis.

Good morning... We do a monthly project for Home Depot that creates on average several million pieces of mail spread over several different postcard sizes and templates - sometimes up to as many as 28 different templates. We've automated the run down to one batch file for everything and just let it run one template after another. We've even got to the point of using a "variable data batch file". I've attached a sample of the two from this past month to give you an example. The "production.bat" file is created by the data processing team as part of their normal routine. It lists the final batch file to run, the size of the postcard, the imposition schema, then form specifics based on that month's postcard form names and data files, and finally a reminder of the machine it is to run on. These file segments get put together in the "call.bat" file (based of the variables with the % leader for each column) which then invokes the command line programming to FusionPro Server. If I were to run all the templates one by one, it would take quite a while, even with being able to run three at a time with FusionPro Server. However this batch file will just run one template after another until it is finishes all files up to the "exit /b" command. I then simply start the production.bat file when I leave for home and come in the next morning to check the log files that were created by FusionPro as to how each job ran. No fuss, no muss, no problems...uh...ummm...usually! As far as I know there is no normal way to automate the Desktop version of FusionPro like this. You will need to be running FusionPro Server. Hope this helps you to free up some extra time. .

We have a number of projects that end up "finishing" as two page nested letters that are matched. The artwork provided is 8.5x11 with bleed (usually from 2 to 4 pages) and the pages need to fold and slit together as a nested pair. I'm attaching a finished piece with markings. In this piece for Cleveland Whiskey the second "nested" page is not actually variable this time, but others have been in the past and will be in the future. Step 1: after printing is to trim the outside edges to turn the 12x18 into an 11x17.5" sheet - basically trimming to all outside crop marks. Step 2: That resulting sheet is put in our folder that has a trimming attachment. As you are looking at the front of the letter with the variable address (page 1 right side)...then imagine folding along the red dotted line so that the left half of the page goes underneath the right, and then trim at the green dashed line. The the resulting two pages are folded again to make the letter size. Step 3: This nested, trimmed and folded letter - that are exactly matched every time - are now fed out of the folder onto a mail-inserter and placed into an envelope. Everything always matches and there is no need to do validation checks which slows down the overall process. My problem is that I need to do a saddle-stitch imposition that includes a .25" to sometimes a .5" gap in the middle. Currently the imposition program included in FusionPro cannot perform that. Saddle-stitch to it means that you can only have the sheets butt-up against each other in the middle. We do literally dozens of these such set-ups weekly now and I would like to know if there is a way of not having waste time doing a manual layout in InDesign each time and just keep the template at the original 8.5x11 size and alter the imposition as needed. Is there a way (either through the GUI or editing the .fpi file manually) of putting a gap in the middle of the saddle-stitch layout? I don't care if the bleed area shows up in the middle since it gets trimmed out anyway. Thanks. .

Gotta a bit of a situation...client wants text to float down the sides of a megaphone on it's end...PLUS...the megaphone is angled at 28%. Either one is simple enough on their own. I can angle a text box 28% by using the properties of the text frame editor. I can also place a couple of empty text boxes above my filled text box and set them to text-wrap to force the type farther and farther into the center. Putting smaller text boxes overlapping slightly and put each box closer to the center can give the appearance of the text in the original box to angle down the megaphone in the desired manner. HOWEVER when I try to ANGLE the text box AND put some kind of text box around it to force is to condense to the center the text-wrap format fails and the text overlaps actually overlap those boxes that were set to force text-wrap. Trial 1) When the original text box is not angled, everything worked. Once an angle is placed on the box, then text-wrap formatting appears to fail. Trial 2) I've also tried this with multiple boxes that get narrower and narrower as the go closer to the middle. Then linked them together to flow the variable paragraph down the megaphone insides. Once again when the boxes are not angled everything works. As soon as an angle is placed on the boxes then the formatting fails. Trial3) I then tried to put the variable paragraph in a "reuseable template page". I got that page to work like it is supposed to and didn't need to angle it. I put the surrounding text boxes set to text-wrap and everything looks correct on that "template page". I then made my rule to put the contents of the template page into a text box on the main template sheet where the megaphone is. Same thing...when the box is not angled everything works fine, when it is angled the text-wrap formatting fails. I'm uploading jpg files to show the problem I'm having. These show only the results I have from Trial 3, but the outcome is the same for trials 1 and 2. Formatting fails when angled. "templateBox" shows the contents of the reusable template page during preview. "angledTextBoxes_2" shows the output page with the two frames when angled and when not angled. I've colored the text-wrap boxes to show them more clearly. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you. .

There are other ways to alter type (or a barcode) using scripts and the character height and width parameters. Can you post a picture of what you are trying to accomplish? Sometimes "putting a box over a portion of the barcode" is not feasible. I've had to alter the height and width before. .

Hey STEP! I've encoded your suggesting and made a tweak or two and everything is working fine. However a "situation" is recurring and I think that I've figured out what is causing it. Can you suggest a way to incorporate it into your code? When the letter grows and flows to the next page, I set a rule to print "Over" at the bottom right of the first page. sidebar - This client must believe that people are sooooo dumb that they don't know the letter would continue on the back of the same page!To make matters worse, they don't just want one or two lines to flow to the back, they want the entire paragraph to skip to the back. That's fine because I can put a "keep with next paragraph" tag in the text. However the bottom closing section contains an in-line signature. That signature is taking up two lines, but FusionPro must be thinking that it is only one rule so it should only take up one line. Every once in a while when the letter grows to barely over the bottom of the first page the signature block and preceding paragraph flow to the back of the first page as it should...but FusionPro still thinks that everything should fit in the text box entirely on the front of the first page. It doesn't put the tag for "Over" in the bottom corner, and it activates the blank back page from the rule that I put in place that when the result from your original rule is False (i.e. everything fits on the front) add a blank page to keep the page count even for imposition purposes. I've enclosed samples of correct and incorrect. Since the "Over" coding is passed only when your rule believes that the amount of text is too big for the text box on the front page, the only thing I can think of that FusionPro may not be taking into consideration is that the signature graphic takes up two lines and not just one. Can you think of a way to fake out your original rule to have it think that the contents of the text going in is one line longer than what is actually going in? This might compensate for the signature graphic being two lines and not just one. function useOverFlow(frameName){ var text = FindTextFrame(frameName).content; text = text.replace(/<variable name="([^"]*)">/g,function(a,b){return RuleOrField(b);}); var tm = new FusionProTextMeasure; tm.useTags = true; tm.maxWidth = GetSettableTextWidth(FindTextFrame(frameName)); tm.CalculateTextExtent(text); return tm.textHeight > GetSettableTextHeight(FindTextFrame(frameName)); }

I've done some testing on this and found a "possible glitch" with the batch numbering in conjunction with imposition while using the "Server" version - desktop works fine. I've uploaded a project that we do for Kent State Univ. It includes a copy (heavily duplicated) of a data file we receive as well as the batch file that we use to call FusionPro. The letter is batched at 1500 records and imposed 2-up on a 12x18 sheet (double sided). When the data file is 1500 records or less the output batch file does not contain a batch number that I would expect FusionPro to add to the file name. I may call the output file "512292_ksu10Day-d10_.pdf" in the command line, but FusionPro should (and up 'til now in previous versions did) output a batched file with "512292_ksu10Day-d10_1.pdf". Surprise! The batched file is named exactly the same as the command line name states: 512292_ksu10Day-d10_.pdf The next test was to do a file that was just one record over the batch of 1500. When I ran the file that was 1501 records FusionPro created 2 batched files and named them properly: "512292_ksu10Day-d10_1.pdf", "512292_ksu10Day-d10_2.pdf". I did not put any formatting on the output files through an OnNewOutput rule. I suppose I could (and maybe will have to) but I would think that FusionPro should be able to use it's own rules.