DSweet

This is a request from one of our clients for a new project... Hello A question for the mail vendor I have is the following: Can they provide the CIT letter in an AFP format? Can they add a TLE record? I might be misrepresenting something but I wanted to find out if I could have these letters also sent into AO DOC center for customer service and they needed the files in this format. Can you confirm with the vendor if they can do this? Thanks! Currently we do projects and just print them. It looks like this customer now wants us to provide back to them a searchable AFP file. AFP is one of the output formats for FusionPro so that's half the problem solved. However I was wondering of FusionPro can insert the Tag Logical Elements (TLE) record that he is referring to? I did some searching online and came up with these TLE records being involved with indexing and searching the files for the IBM workflow. More and more companies are asking us to provide optimized pdf files for their customer service departments so they can have an exact copy of what was mailed to the client in front of them when any of the end-customers call in with requests or questions about their accounts -- or for whatever reason the mailing was sent. This is the first request we've received for a specific format to be used in a specific workflow. Can anyone shed some light on this? .

I don't know if this follows along with your specific posting since I don't run from my Mac too much anymore, but I have noticed that FusionPro is very memory intensive. A large data file might cause problems. I've even caused our FusionPro Server to crash once I get files over 400,000 - even when I batch them into smaller segments on output. As each record reads in FusionPro just keeps using more and more memory until the machine simply crashes or the final record is read in and composed. I've been having problems like this since back in the days of FusionPro 3.0. I was under the impression back then that once a "batched output file" was written that FusionPro would have cleared out the memory before continuing on. It seems that PTI still has not dealt too much with that. Check the memory usage of your machine as you are composing or when you hit your submit button and see what is going on.

A client of ours has requested that we output a file for them in a jpeg format in addition to the pdf output. They are setting up ads that will be placed in different magazines and other such periodicals. Some of these agencies are fine with a pdf file but others request that a jpeg or a tiff file be provided for layout placement. No problem here...FusionPro has encorporated a jpeg option feature where you can set the size and the quality of the jpeg file requested. Wohoo! Whistles and Cheers! HOWEVER...even though Acrobat can export a jpeg file in either a grayscale, an rgb, or a cmyk format it appears that FusionPro can ONLY output in an RGB format. This now becomes a sticking point since the requested files are almost always requested to be in a final print format...i.e. a CMYK format. Awwwww. Is there any hint or smoke signals in the works to enhance the jpeg output feature (which I am assuming is produced through Acrobat's export feature) that will allow us to select the color format of the output...gray, rgb, or cmyk? Or even to export into any other format type...png, tiff, etc? Or has this feature been encorporated into verion 9 and I just need to upgrade again to get it? One other observation output jpeg...whenever I set the output resolution value to higher than 100 dpi (mine were set for print values of 300 dpi) and then I go back to that same option menu, the value is once again set at 100 dpi. The output of what was produced once the value is set and saved at 300 was indeed measured at 300 dpi in Photoshop, but for some reason FusionPro resets that value back to 100 and jpegs are then produced at that level. If you are not careful you might forget to reset the value if you make other option setting changes. Bwaaahhh! .

Sorry about the confusion with sort of going off into left field with the original thread topic. BTW I sort of came up with the name currentOutputFileName on my own, I just sort of follow some basic logic using ".currentOutputFileNumber" as being the batch numbers that FusionPro generates and ".outputFormatExtension" as the extension of the file and just came up with what I would think FusionPro might call the base name of the file iteslf from the command line call. Thank you for your help. Your suggested coding worked...as it usually does. .

I new there had to be a way to do it, thanks. However one last thought. Since we process these larger jobs via FP Server, I assign the output file name as part of the command line. It would normally contains a six digit job number, a short description and lastly the extension. Something like "12345_outputName_.pdf", and then FP Server takes that base name and appends the batch numbers to it "12345_outputName_1.pdf", "12345_outputName_2.pdf", "12345_outputName_3.pdf", and so forth. If I use this javascript rule in the OnNewOutputFile rule FusionPro.Composition.outputFileName = FusionPro.Composition.currentOutputFileName + "_" + FormatNumber("000000", FusionPro.Composition.currentOutputFileNumber) + "." + FusionPro.Composition.outputFormatExtension;would that give me the resulting output on FP Server of "12345_outputName_000001.pdf", "12345_outputName_000002.pdf", "12345_outputName_000003.pdf", and so forth? Additional note (09/23 am): I have tried the above command and - although I do not get an error or a warning from FusionPro - the resulting filename that I get using the FP Desktop version is named "undefined_000001.pdf"? Is the reason because Desktop does not work on a command line and just Server functionality would be able to comprehend such a object name? I do notice that Server and Desktop work slightly different than one another. .

Dan, I don't know if it is relative to this thread or not, but is there anyway to pad the zero's of the output batch? We have a number of jobs that batch well into the 100's and a few that go into the 1000's of batches. Some of our printer operators are getting confused when the files are listed in the job folders by default using numerical sortation where file "batch 2" would be listed in between "batch 19" and "batch 200" and "batch 100" could be listed before "batch 11". Not very savy. Is there a way of forcing a number of padded zero's infront of the batch number? Would that be an OnNewOutputFile javascript rule? .

inFile = ToUpper(FusionPro.Composition.inputFileName); You need to set it in the OnJobStartRule section. This will set a global variable called inFile to the value the string of the entire input file name...path and all. You can then manipulate it as you would like. Our files come in with a job number then an underscore then the file name and extension. I parse it out thusly... inFile = ToUpper(FusionPro.Composition.inputFileName); var i = inFile.lastIndexOf("\\"); jobnbr_out = Mid(inFile, i+2, 5); input_file = Mid(inFile, i+2, (inFile.length - i)); file_type = Mid(inFile, i+8, 2);I'm not quite sure about the structure of paths on a mac or using is across different networks but the basic structure of the assignment should be the same.

Good morning. I've used this javascript coding which is an edited form of the base wizard rule that is in FusionPro... if (Trim(Field("Intelligent Mail barcode")) != "") { Var1="Intelligent Mail barcode"; Var2=""; Var3="16"; v_tracking="0"; v_font="USPS4CB"; fontTag="0"; Var4="FATD"; if (Var2 != "") { if ((Field(Var2).length != 0) && (Field(Var2).length != 5) && (Field(Var2).length != 9) && (Field(Var2).length != 11)) ReportWarning("The routing number is not the correct length of 0, 5, 9, or 11 characters in record number " + CurrentRecordNumber() + "."); RoutingNum=Field(Var2); } else RoutingNum=""; if (fontTag == "0") fontTag=false; else fontTag=true; var imbOut = '<tracking newsize="' + v_tracking + '">' + MakeOneCodeBarcode(Field(Var1), RoutingNum, Var3, fontTag, v_font, Var4) + "</tracking>"; return imbOut //return ReplaceSubstring(imbOut, '<z newsize="16">', '<z newsize="16"><setwidth newsize="15.5">') } else { return ""; }You would simply need to edit the field markers to match what you are using. The second return feature that I have commented out is used when I need to shrink the width of the imb coding slightly. The font that I use is called USPS4CB, but I do believe that this could work for any font as long as you use the name of it here. Also remember to check the tagged text feature for this rule. Hope this helps. .

Are you using this as a Desktop template or as a Server template? If you are using it as a server then you could use a different config file to run your command line and accomplish this. Not too sure about the desktop version of it though.

You had asked me to send you a sample of line leading that is used with “legacy line leading” because it contains problems of not appearing to flow correctly when the normal line leading is used. The sample I am attaching contains examples of that. Mostly from what I’ve found it deals with text wrapping around other text and graphic boxes and there is also an extra little wrinkle in the usage of super and/or subscript characters. There appears to be an extra leading gap where the boxes that are set to be the boundaries for the wrapping begin and end and when super and subscript characters fall at the end of a line. In my example, when line legacy is turned off you will notice extra leading gaps appearring in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 as the body copy begins to flow over the regions bounded by the boxes along the right edge that are set for the text wrapping around the figures on the stock. You will also notice that the line leading for the last line of paragraph 1, which contains a superscript character at the end of line, appears to be correct. Now, when you turn line legacy on, paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 now all appear correctly and flow around the wrapped box regions without any extra gaps. However look again at the end of paragraph 1 and you will see that the extra gap has now been transferred there since the end of the line is a superscript character. Take off the superscript and that line once again appears correctly. We work with a number of banks and law offices that continually use superscripts for notations and they are more and more also using stock with numerous charting and graphics that I need to have text flow around and through. It has been quite frustrating over the years having to judge which of the two was more important - correct leading with legacy for paragraphs or without legacy with super and subscript footnotes. So far I have been able to “fake it” and luckily our customers have not called us on this yet. But I would greatly appreciate if your tech teams at PTI would please fix these obvious errors. Thanks for any and all the help that you guys do for us. .

Are we able to use Legacy Line Leading in only certain areas of a template? Either turn it on and off dynamically or as a single text box parameter setting? If I have 2 text boxes on my template page, can I use Legacy Line Leading for only one of them and have the other text box use the default line leading parameters? If the current answer is no, then I would like to submit that possibility for a future FusionPro edition. Thanks. .

I'm being asked to submit this to the Forum...one of our customers (a rather major one) is submitting an AFP file to us which is ready to go for most printers...except ours. The AFP file is the only way that this client wants to give us the file (in reality I think it's more like it's the only way they CAN do it because it was done this way in the past and nobody there understands any other way of re-doing it). Within this AFP file is a print stream of 10's of thousands of individual applications that can range from being only 1 page to up to as many as 6 pages per individual record. One of our programmers has jury-rigged a number of different 3rd party programs together to convert this file into PCL, then using perl scripts and other such magic scripts extracts the address data from each application to feed into our BCC Mailing System to generate our mail data forms for the Post Office. Then we need to split the printstreams into all the single page, all the 2 pages, the 3 pages, and so on. Please don't ask me why...I'm just the one that is submitting the question. Personally I have not used AFP files at all, but I am told that fonts are added at the first occurrence of it in the file. So if the font is defined on page 1 and you try to read in page 105, then that font is not loaded. Again this is what I am informed happens. I would like to know if since FusionPro can now output an AFP file as a composition stream, can FusionPro now understand an AFP file as an input resource? And if so, how would I reference the different pages of the document? Would it be like using a ".pagenumber=xx" command when referencing a specific page in a PDF resource? Or is there a different method that is not documented? Sorry for being rather long winded on this one. .

So using "PageMedia" (which I do admit is a rather ancient method of doing a page selection) or the the PPD and JDF functions are completely useless when doing any form of imposition? Even when every template page imposed on "page 1" is tagged for "white stock" and everything on "page 2" is tagged for "blue stock"? I would of at least expected some kind of postscript error to pop up stating some type of incompatibility rather than the entire command line simply being removed by FusionPro. .

I have a two page document that is being used as a base for an NCR job. Our laser operators want this to be programmed to call out the specific stock by name and other settings since one page of the ncr is cardstock and the other is just ncr paper. This is right up the alley for using the Advanced->PageMedia menu and defining what is needed in an external file. The problem that I'm having is when I impose this document 3-up (or even just 1-up) FusionPro drops any PageMedia commands that I program to be sent in the postscript code at the beginning of each page. When I open the un-imposed postscript file in a text editor I can find the string <</PageSize [612 792] /MediaColor (blue) /MediaType (plain) >> but when I look at the imposed postscript file I cannot find that same string. I have the same problem when I use the PPD version to define the stocks that are being called. Is this another bug? Or am I still missing something with this? .

Dan, While you are checking out this bug, maybe you can also address what I think is another bug in the fixed-length format of FusionPro. I am not able to copy a data definition structure from one template set up as fixed length to another using the "import data source from another document" option of the Data Definition. The new document is indeed set up as fixed length, but I have to go into the edit fields option and re-insert all the field names and their lengths instead of this information being copied over. There is only one field and it is called "Field0". .

Do you want me to just post the data file? Would that be enough for you to test this problem? If that's all you need then here...I'll also include the header which I had copied off to a separate file since it is normally not used for a fixed length file. Opt. Endorsement Line******************] Sack Pack Vi Vis Sequence Number] First Name***************] Last Name****************] Delivery Address*********] Alternate 1 Address******] City*************] St ZIP+4****] Intelligent Mail barcode***************************************** Intelligent Mail barcode******* Sample********] Containe First Name***************] Last Name****************] Delivery Address*********] Alternate 1 Address******] City*************] St ZIP+4****] RAW FIRST****************] RAW LAST*****************] RAW ADDRESS**************] RAW ADDRESS 2************] RAW CITY*********] RA RAW ZIP**] 2 1 209 J Hamer 11900 Appleton Dr Parma Heights OH 44130-0000 DTADTATDADFAAAFAFFDAAFAAATADTTFTFFFTFAFTFTADDFDDATFTTDDDADFAADDTT 0030120112208051160844130 ***XXAUDIT***XX 1 FT 5 1 825 Paul Preziosi 6 Tuxedo Pl Morristown NJ 07960-3733 DFAFADATDATFTATDTATTDDTTDDFFFATFFAAATTTFTTTFATAFAFAFTFAADFDDDADAD 0030120112208051222407960 ***XXAUDIT***XX 1 FT If you just copy what is in the code portion and pate it into an empty wordpad file you should get the entire "test" data file that I used.

I've tried several times to upload the zip file but it doesn't work. I keep getting a message screen that PTI has encountered some sort of database error. The zip file is only about 900K in size so it can't be too big to upload. I've done bigger ones. I've also sent a message to the forum support with a snapshot of the error message I keep getting, but no response as of yet. If you could send me your email in a private message I would be glad to send it to you. Hope you can make heads of tails out of it. .

Will FusionPro Imposer work on Fixed Length Files? If I compose a document without imposition everything work fine. If I put any type of imposition (even a 1-up imposition) FusionPro has a conniption fit half way through the data file and states that it can't find the variables that it did find for the first half? Is this a known bug? .

You also get that same warning/error message in the log file if there is a "blank" in one of the variables. If there is a blank, FusionPro can not copyfit that so it shows up as an warning/error message. Took me a while to figure that one out. .

Over three years and a number of enhancements have gone on since this posting. Are there any sightings for a drop shadow on a graphic frame on the horizon? Also as for the drop shadow being a text frame only feature, is there a way to put it on the frame itself and not the text in the frame? .

O.K. we've made the jump to FusionPro 8.0.20 and I am able to use the "MakeQRBarcodeGraphic" command instead of the font version, however I now have a question about the displaying of this type of graphic. Is there a way to change the color of the graphic styled barcode? Our customer wants the display to be the same color as the printed version of their business cards. There business cards will be Reflex Blue, and the want this "on screen proof" to be an "exact replica of their printed card". So far I can only see how to make the barcode and not change the color of the barcode. At least with the font version I was able to change the color of the font. I seem to have a problem no matter which method I use. Meth. 01 - If I use the font version I can change the color, but I can't resize the output using the copyFit functions so I am limited in the amount of characters that I can allow in the barcode. Not what the customer wants. Meth. 02 - If I use the graphic version I can resize the output at will so I don't have the character limitation as with the font version, but I am limited to only displaying the graphic as black. Again, not what the customer wants. A little help please... .

I'm given a file of 200 to 300 records to "redo" that are spread throughout data files of 50,000 to 100,000 records. You're saying that FusionPro can no longer write out a subset-file and use that for composition and I need to wait for FusionPro to compose the entire file "skipping over" those records that do not match the records in the redo-file? Boy will that add a huge amount of time to the FusionPro Server schedule. It use to take FusionPro about 15 to 20 seconds to do this. Now...??? .

We are in the processes of doing our own testing of FusionPro 8 Server and have been running numerous templates on it to try and "break it". I think I've found one. We use two different servers (a developmental server for our own testing and one live server for our customers). FusionPro 8.0.20 is on our dev server and 7.1P1C is on our live server. I have a template that I've been running since version 6.x on FusionPro Server that allows me to run a "redo" batch of records by extracting them from the main data file and creating a "new temporary data file". There may be a better way of doing this, but my problem is that this template works on 7.1P1C but not on Version 8.0.20. I use the command "FusionPro.Composition.inputFileName = newfilename;" to invoke the composition engine and use the temporary "redo subset" batch file instead of the larger main data file. This way I don't have to pull out all the redo records from within the main data base - FusionPro will do it on it's own. At least it used to. Instead of creating the smaller, temporary "redo" data file, FusionPro 8 simply runs the template using the entire main data file and appears to by-pass the steps that create the smaller file. redoDataFileName = new ExternalDataFileEx("redoFileName.txt", "\t"); redoDataFile = redoDataFileName.GetFieldValue(1, "omxFileName"); //create the array of redo record numbers Redo_File = new ExternalDataFileEx(redoDataFile, "\t"); Redo_Recs = new Array(); totalRedos = Redo_File.recordCount; recCount = 1; for (var m = 0; m <= totalRedos; m++) { Redo_Recs[m] = Redo_File.GetFieldValue(m, "Seq #"); } var FieldDelimiter = ","; // EDIT THIS ("\t" for tab-delimited) var FieldDelim2 = '","'; // EDIT THIS ("\t" for tab-delimited) var orginputfilename = FusionPro.Composition.inputFileName; // For composition, the original name is set, // and the new name must be specified as an HFS path on Mac. // EDIT THIS var partial = orginputfilename.lastIndexOf("\\"); var pathName = orginputfilename.substring(0, partial+1); var newfilename = pathName + "tempout_comma.txt"; if (FusionPro.inValidation) { // For composition, both names must be specified as POSIX paths on Mac. // EDIT THIS orginputfilename = pathName + "temp_Instance.txt"; // EDIT THIS newfilename = pathName + "temp_data_file.txt"; } var sf = new ExternalDataFileEx(orginputfilename, FieldDelimiter); if (!sf.valid) throw("Unable to open ExternalDataFile: " + orginputfilename); var of = new File(newfilename); if (of.open("create") == false) throw("Could not create output file."); of.close(); if (of.open("write") == false) throw("Could not write output file."); of.write('"'); for (var i=0;i<sf.fieldCount;i++) { if (i) of.write(FieldDelim2); of.write(sf.GetFieldValue(0, i)); } of.write('"\r\n'); for (var i=1 ; i<=totalRedos ; i++) { of.write('"'); for (var k=0 ; k< sf.fieldCount ; k++) { var foundSeq = sf.FindRecord("SEQNO", Redo_Recs[i]); if (foundSeq) { if (k) of.write(FieldDelim2); of.write(sf.GetFieldValue(foundSeq,k)); } } // { // if (k) // of.write(FieldDelim2); // of.write(sf.GetFieldValue(Redo_Recs[i],k)); // } of.write('"\r\n'); } of.close(); FusionPro.Composition.inputFileName = newfilename;This coding should look familiar to many of you since I believe it came from PTI's Dan Korn quite a few versions ago. Does FusionPro 8 have a different method to create a temporary file? Or does it not recognize some line of this coding anymore? I would like to upload the template and the data file for this, but it is way too large for this Forum. Is there an address I can send it to? To someone's attention? As an added edit to this here is the output from the two .msg file that are created for the same template From the dev server: OnJobStart, line 40: ReferenceError: File is not defined Job started 16:56:18 - 1344372978. Creator: FusionPro(TM) VDP Producer (API) 8.0.20 Computer Name: FUSIONPRO Current working folder: C:\Program Files\PTI\FusionPro Template File: D:\fusionProJobs\Omax\RetailConnectMailer\redoWorkFiles\OMRC_Redos.dif Input File: D:\fusionProJobs\Omax\RetailConnectMailer\redoWorkFiles\220810_03_merged.TXT Job Config File: D:\fusionProJobs\Omax\RetailConnectMailer\redoWorkFiles\OMRC_Redos-output.cfg Preprocessing started 16:56:18 - 1344372978. Preprocessing record #1, input record 1 Preprocessing record #2, input record 2 Preprocessing record #3, input record 3 Preprocessing record #4, input record 4 from the "live server" Job started 16:19:07 - 1344370747. Creator: FusionPro(TM) Server 7.1P1c Computer Name: FP_LIVE Current working folder: C:\Program Files\Printable\FusionPro Template File: D:\fusionProJobs\Omax\RetailConnectMailer\redoWorkFiles\OMRC_Redos.dif Input File: D:\fusionProJobs\Omax\RetailConnectMailer\redoWorkFiles\tempout_comma.txt Job Config File: D:\fusionProJobs\Omax\RetailConnectMailer\redoWorkFiles\OMRC_Redos-output.cfg Preprocessing started 16:19:07 - 1344370747. Preprocessing input record #1 Preprocessing input record #2 Preprocessing input record #3 Preprocessing input record #4 .

Thanks for a quick reply. Yes, it did create an output even with those error/warning labels in the message file. I have two graphic frames on top on one another for either condition - one being rotated 90 degrees while the other is not. Since neither of the frames were turned off via the OnRecordStart rule, the card was super-imposed on top of itself with one image being rotated 90 degrees. I tried your solution and at first it did not work. I just added the command like this... function IsResourceLandscape(res) { if (!res instanceof FusionProResource) throw "Not a resource: " + res; if (!res.exists) throw "Resource not found: " + res; var TM = new FusionProTextMeasure; TM.useTags = true; var err=TM.CalculateTextExtent(res.content); if (err) throw "Error measuring resource: " + res + ": " + TM.messages; //Print(res + ": Width=" + TM.textWidth + ", Depth=" + TM.textHeight); return TM.textWidth > TM.textHeight; } if (FusionPro.Composition.inPreprocessing) return; var r = new FusionProResource(Rule("shellName"), "graphic", true); if (IsResourceLandscape(r)) { FindGraphicFrame("Portrait_2").suppress = true; FindGraphicFrame("Portrait_3").suppress = true; } else { FindGraphicFrame("Landscape_2").suppress = true; FindGraphicFrame("Landscape_3").suppress = true; }However that returned the exact same result. I had to move the function command into the "Global Javascripts" location and surround the rest of the statements into the if statement like this... if (FusionPro.Composition.inPreprocessing) { return; } else { var r = new FusionProResource(Rule("shellName"), "graphic", true); if (IsResourceLandscape(r)) { FindGraphicFrame("Portrait_2").suppress = true; FindGraphicFrame("Portrait_3").suppress = true; } else { FindGraphicFrame("Landscape_2").suppress = true; FindGraphicFrame("Landscape_3").suppress = true; } }Then it worked like a charm. Again, thank you. One final question...is there any reason why this rule would not work in OnJobStart instead of OnRecordStart? It seems rather silly to have to check the same pdf file over and over checking to see if it had altered somewhere during the middle of the process. I know I could put some sort of additional code around all of this to only do this for the first record, but I don't know if that would mess up the pre-processing scheme as well. .

Hello, I have another wrench to through into this mix. Don't know if this is a bug or not, or even if it belongs in this thread...but this is where I received the original answer as to how to proceed with a pdf file of unknown orientation. The situation...I have a template to create a 7x5 mailing postcard with a variable background provided as a 2 page PDF file. My problem...I don't know if the file will be supplied as a 7x5 - landscape card, or a 5x7 - portrait card. I used the following code in OnRecordStart function IsResourceLandscape(res) { if (!res instanceof FusionProResource) throw "Not a resource: " + res; if (!res.exists) throw "Resource not found: " + res; var TM = new FusionProTextMeasure; TM.useTags = true; var err=TM.CalculateTextExtent(res.content); if (err) throw "Error measuring resource: " + res + ": " + TM.messages; //Print(res + ": Width=" + TM.textWidth + ", Depth=" + TM.textHeight); return TM.textWidth > TM.textHeight; } var r = new FusionProResource(Rule("shellName"), "graphic", true); if (IsResourceLandscape(r)) { FindGraphicFrame("Portrait_2").suppress = true; FindGraphicFrame("Portrait_3").suppress = true; } else { FindGraphicFrame("Landscape_2").suppress = true; FindGraphicFrame("Landscape_3").suppress = true; }The rule "shellName" simply defines location and name of the uploaded pdf file that is listed as a variable in the data file. The OnRecordStart rule determines what orientation the uploaded card is and turns off the proper boxes when it needs to. When I process my file without any imposition, everything come out fine. The orientation of the uploaded pdf file is properly determined and the output mail cards are rotated and processed correctly. HOWEVER...if I put a simple 4-up imposition, then the process is all gummed up and FusionPro states that it cannot find the input resource. Preprocessing input record #1 uncaught exception: Error measuring resource: Resource("..\\intermediateDocuments\\7X5 Postcards_16638.PDF"): Graphic is not found or is not processsed properly: \\Graphicsnt\MISXfer\to_DavidSweet\FireWire 58600\BrandMuscle\NewBalance\NEW-7X5-PCH\intermediateDocuments\7X5 Postcards_16638.PDF. Check for file existence and that it is of the proper format. Graphic is not found or is not processsed properly: \\Graphicsnt\MISXfer\to_DavidSweet\FireWire 58600\BrandMuscle\NewBalance\NEW-7X5-PCH\intermediateDocuments\7X5 Postcards_16638.PDF. Check for file existence and that it is of the proper format. Graphic is not found or is not processsed properly: \\Graphicsnt\MISXfer\to_DavidSweet\FireWire 58600\BrandMuscle\NewBalance\NEW-7X5-PCH\intermediateDocuments\7X5 Postcards_16638.PDF. Check for file existence and that it is of the proper format. Preprocessing input record #2 uncaught exception: Error measuring resource: Resource("..\\intermediateDocuments\\7X5 Postcards_16638.PDF"): Graphic is not found or is not processsed properly: \\Graphicsnt\MISXfer\to_DavidSweet\FireWire 58600\BrandMuscle\NewBalance\NEW-7X5-PCH\intermediateDocuments\7X5 Postcards_16638.PDF. Check for file existence and that it is of the proper format. Graphic is not found or is not processsed properly: \\Graphicsnt\MISXfer\to_DavidSweet\FireWire 58600\BrandMuscle\NewBalance\NEW-7X5-PCH\intermediateDocuments\7X5 Postcards_16638.PDF. Check for file existence and that it is of the proper format. Graphic is not found or is not processsed properly: \\Graphicsnt\MISXfer\to_DavidSweet\FireWire 58600\BrandMuscle\NewBalance\NEW-7X5-PCH\intermediateDocuments\7X5 Postcards_16638.PDF. Check for file existence and that it is of the proper format. Preprocessing input record #3...and so on to the end of the file. Why would imposition gumm up the works? Is this a bug? Is this something in the "pre-processing" routine that FusionPro does? I thought that part was a simple counting of the records to determine the imposition break-down and didn't have anything to do with the actual template processing until the second run? Again is this a bug?!? Or have I missed some step? I also tried putting this rule in OnJobStart (where I think it really should be) and tried to determine the orientation of the pdf file only one time instead of repeating it needlessly for every record using up valuable processing time. I was hoping that OnJobStart rules would be processed before the "pre-processing" routines of counting records would be done. However FusionPro would not recognize the rule in that location and could not determine the orientation at all.