Jump to content

KatJones

Registered Users - Approved
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

Converted

  • Location
    Atlanta, GA

Converted

  • Occupation
    Digital Media Specialist

Converted

  • FusionPro Products
    Yes

Converted

  • FusionPro VDP software version
    9.1.0 Producer

Converted

  • OS
    Windows Server 2008 R2

Converted

  • Acrobat Version
    Acrobat X (10)

KatJones's Achievements

Explorer

Explorer (4/14)

  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

10

Reputation

  1. I am using the producer, but I see what you are saying. I am getting an error message that the other files cannot being copied over to the FusionPro_Output folder. However when I go to the FusionPro_Working folder they are all there. Not sure how to fix the error at this moment, and that is a task for another day. But thank you.
  2. Good afternoon. I need to do exactly what the original posted asked however, when I go to my output its only a one record PDF titled as the last record field name I designated in the rule. I have a data file 496,101 records with 104 different "chunks" so in theory I should have 104 different pdfs all with different quantities and titled with corresponding "chunk" name. Im thinking it maybe a glitch or something, but I figured I would ask here before I head to support.
  3. I have tried this with imposition (infinite stack checked and without), without imposition. I didn't have the output to multiple files checked at all. It is still producing one output. :confused:
  4. Hello, Following back up on this. We now have upgraded to 9.1.0. On output do I need to check anything? Like the output to multiple files or anything. Im not seeing my files output as separate files based on the field change. I should mention that I used an imposition file with this. Does that matter?
  5. Using USPSIMBStandard doesn't yield anything visible to a numerical string.
  6. I need assistance in creating a IMB that passes postal regulations using numbers, not ALPHA characters. I have very little knowledge about mail/postal software, so any assistance would be appreciated. My data processing department no longer wants to use the ALPHA character field (ONECODE) and wants to start using the IMBDIGITS field.
  7. I think we are almost there! Your code seems to work with setup :D:D... however there seems to be a huge space in between the variable fields and the image when it shifts. When it gets to all 10 fields being populated the image runs off the page because of the huge gap. The image itself doesn't have as much white space that the preview is showing.
  8. I took your example, which works beautiful and wonderfully and does EXACTLY what I need it to do for mine, but when I copied and pasted to my layout and just switched out the field names and resource names it works... but... The variable fields show duplicated on the preview. It will show the field(s) a large space/gap and then repeat those fields but they are tabbed over, then it will show the resource. I noticed in your text frame you had custom tabs set up, but I didn't think that would have anything to do with the variable fields showing up twice even tho I don't have in the my text frame twice
  9. Yes I did duplicate the rule and change the count. I have attached a mock version of the actual piece with the graphic positions already in place. The fields I was referencing in this thread are called "clientid", "clientid2", etc... "ClientID" will always be populated, but as you can see that ClientID2 thru ClientID10 sometimes won't. So when 2-10 aren't populated the graphic frame that I have named as "Position 1" should show. And when all 10 ClientID fields are populated only the graphic frame I have named as "Position 9" should show. PTI.zip
  10. I was so hopeful that code was going to work... but it didn't It doesn't switch, only shows the resource for if fields 2-10 are empty, but when Field 1 and 2 is populated and 3-10 are empty and so on, the other graphic frames doesn't work.
  11. That didn't appear to work. All 9 graphics still showed up, overlapping one another, in the record where Field 1 was only one populated while 2-10 was blank, and if field 1&2 was populated but 3-10 was blank, and so on... Also when I inserted your code I got the syntax error message that missing ) in line 1 after the argument. So I tried this and didn't get a error but still it didn't work: if (Field("field2") == "") return Resource("MYRESOURCE"); else return NullResource();
  12. It is the #3 thru #10 Paragraphs, an image of text due to font issues. Otherwise this would be a text rule issue I'm having. No. it is just one graphic that I need to move around. I assumed that could make 9 different graphic rules with the graphic being suppressed if it conditions of that particular rule didn't apply. Field 1 will never be empty. However 2-10 may be. So if Field 1 is populated I would need the "text" Image to be close to the variable data, IF Field 1 and 2 are populated and 3-10 are empty then the same image would need to be in another position as not to block the populated data, OR show up where the first graphic box is. So forth for if field 1, 2, and 3 is populated but 4-10 aren't. It won't jump around like that. The fields would be in consecutive order of how it populates. Specific fields I hope my answers help you help me =)
  13. I need help writing a rule that I am sure is fairly easy, however I can't wrap my head around exactly how to write it. I have 1(one) graphic that I need to fluctuate 9 times in position on the page based on the database. I have 9 fields that all have different data in them per record. Sometimes all 9 fields for one record are populated, sometimes only 1 or 2 fields is populated. I would need the rule for my graphic position 1 to say: If field "field 1" and "field 2" and "Field 3", Etc... is blank return my graphic. Else return nothing at all. and the same thing for my graphic position 2, where the rule would say: If field "field 2" and "field 3" and "Field 4", Etc... is blank return my graphic. Else return nothing at all. Each subsequent graphic rule would be one less field to consider because in theory that one will be populated. Everything I have tried resulted in my graphic showing up in all the positions even though I excluded one field for each subsequent rule I wrote. I have included an example of what I am trying to achieve. See how the bottom text (Which I made a graphic-due to font issues) moves with the variable text-that I blurred out for security purposes. for PTI Example.pdf
  14. When composing files that consist of mostly text boxes via Direct, it SOMETIMES discards my leading setting. The quick fix solution is to just quit Acrobat and reoutput, and that will be okay if I was always dealing with small jobs. However this was brought to my attention on a large job. Is this a glitch? How can I fix? I have attached 2 image screen shots of my problem.Archive.zip
×
×
  • Create New...